Target intention
Observed 5D hand states and 8D hand-object geometry produce soft target probabilities over candidate objects.
Egocentric head motion prediction
A Hand-Driven Active Perception Framework
Anticipating future human head motion from hand dynamics, interaction intent, and target-conditioned occlusion.
Motivation
During manipulation, the head redirects perception toward an interaction target while remaining coordinated with upper-body and hand motion. Treating future head motion as passive trajectory continuation misses both effects.
HAP predicts future 6-DoF human head motion from an observed interaction history. It infers target confidence from hand motion and object geometry, reasons over dynamic target-conditioned occlusion, and combines learned motion with a constant-velocity prior at each prediction horizon.
Method
HAP connects target inference, dynamic occlusion reasoning, and motion prediction in a single target-conditioned forecasting pipeline.
Observed 5D hand states and 8D hand-object geometry produce soft target probabilities over candidate objects.
A Predictive Target-centric Amodal Occlusion Graph represents current occlusion and potential risk among candidates.
Directed PNA layers and a causal GRU encode graph evolution before a horizon-wise gate blends learned and constant-velocity trajectories.
EgoPAT3Dv2 + Bottle
We evaluate HAP on EgoPAT3Dv2 and Bottle. Bottle contains 12 recording sessions and 382 reach-to-target clips with coordinated hand motion, viewpoint changes, and changing target visibility; its experiments use a session-disjoint 10/1/1 split. EgoPAT3Dv2 uses a subject-disjoint 773/84/118 train/validation/test split.
Held-out test sets
Each cell reports EgoPAT3Dv2 / Bottle; translation is in millimeters and rotation in degrees.
| Method | tADE ↓ | tFDE ↓ | rADE ↓ | rFDE ↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVH | 10.685 / 26.656 | 23.600 / 57.321 | 2.145 / 1.877 | 4.469 / 3.946 |
| UniHand | 24.934 / 58.754 | 39.603 / 75.685 | 4.929 / 3.905 | 6.133 / 4.848 |
| DKF | 20.934 / 36.351 | 38.403 / 60.419 | 2.922 / 2.975 | 5.037 / 4.643 |
| RVAE | 12.597 / 26.088 | 24.338 / 42.587 | 2.013 / 1.977 | 3.683 / 3.125 |
| DASE | 15.275 / 25.596 | 29.510 / 43.576 | 2.094 / 2.067 | 3.781 / 3.218 |
| VRNN | 22.195 / 38.714 | 39.660 / 63.683 | 3.105 / 3.077 | 5.184 / 4.651 |
| SRNN | 20.599 / 36.423 | 39.028 / 60.075 | 3.139 / 3.210 | 5.200 / 4.727 |
| AGF | 19.012 / 40.821 | 33.933 / 65.973 | 2.615 / 3.094 | 4.540 / 4.914 |
| OCT | 14.764 / 35.858 | 27.462 / 57.169 | 2.386 / 2.491 | 4.053 / 3.876 |
| USST | 19.665 / 40.233 | 33.319 / 61.688 | 3.023 / 3.117 | 4.918 / 4.625 |
| Diff-IP2D | 28.515 / 53.849 | 44.141 / 76.828 | 4.778 / 3.883 | 6.159 / 4.926 |
| MADiff | 24.601 / 38.292 | 44.312 / 63.509 | 3.774 / 3.048 | 6.190 / 5.020 |
| HAP (DA3) | 10.563 / 18.563 | 22.251 / 36.619 | 2.091 / 1.495 | 4.123 / 2.760 |
| HAP (ORB-SLAM3) | 8.897 / 19.087 | 18.098 / 36.283 | 1.538 / 1.731 | 3.178 / 3.115 |
32.3%
HAP achieves the strongest overall results among the evaluated methods. EgoPAT3Dv2 has substantially lower translational errors, while Bottle tests prediction under frequent, evolving target occlusion.
The fixed target-intention estimator reaches 92.79% top-1 accuracy (206/222) on the curated EgoPAT3Dv2 validation split. On Bottle, Full HAP reports 18.563 / 36.619 mm tADE/tFDE and 1.495 / 2.760 deg rADE/rFDE; the horizon-wise gate improves both motion-only and P-TAOG-conditioned predictors.
Qualitative comparison
Across independent test clips, target-conditioned context helps HAP reduce endpoint drift and better match changes in future head motion.
Visualizations
Short observations from the Bottle interaction set.
Citation
@misc{anonymous2026hap,
title = {HAP: A Hand-Driven Active Perception Framework for
Egocentric Head Motion Prediction},
author = {Anonymous},
year = {2026}
}